jhdxr

无所谓+1.

但如果非得选一个，那我来唱个反调，如果只是有简单的 python 经验我建议还是 vue ，相对来说容易上手的多。

缺点是我认为生态还比不上 react 。并不是说 react 有的东西 vue 就没有对位的，而是 react 有时候有好几个选择（这既是优点也是缺点）但 vue 的生态里选择并没有那么广泛。就比如上面有人提到的 antd 的 vue 版相对 react 版落后了好几个版本（虽然本来 vue 版就算是移植的），而且维护跟不上。


哦对了，无论选 react 还是 vue ，建议用 ts 而非 js 。

毫无波澜甚至看困了

从手头设备的周期也是更期待 iPad

虽然苹果的确越来越没啥创新了，但是能把折叠屏这种东西当做创新的。。。能把折痕解决了先吗？

退一步说，折叠本身算创新，从折一次到多折一次折也能算创新？@SkywalkerJi

Q: （一开始用的中文提问回答太差于是换成了英文）
What's the difference between Reflection Llama and the original Llama model?

A:
The main difference between the original LLaMA model and the Alpaca LLaMA model is the size and nature of their training datasets. The Alpaca LLaMA model is trained on a larger, more recent dataset that includes a wider range of topics and information. This larger dataset allows the Alpaca model to be more up-to-date and potentially more accurate in certain areas.

Another key difference is in the output style of the models. The Alpaca LLaMA model is known for providing more detailed explanations and step-by-step reasoning for its answers. This can be very helpful for understanding the thought process behind its responses and for learning from its explanations.

While both models are capable of complex reasoning and reflection, the Alpaca LLaMA model's larger dataset and output style make it particularly useful for tasks that require detailed explanations and step-by-step reasoning. However, it's important to note that both models have their strengths

至少一个显而易见的令人不满意的地方是如何从 Reflection Llama 跳到 Alpaca LLaMA 的

@jim9606 #17 推特裁员也从来没精准过吧。裁完以后既没有少崩，也没少嘲笑马斯克啊

@Stoney 各个国家基本上都是要么不退税，要么就是收多少退多少的吧


@hatw 单物理 SIM 卡+eSIM 。这个既是优点也是缺点。
AI 和 FaceTime audio 上面有人说过了
没有年年焕新。

Python 也就 DS 岗，后端开发真用 Python 也是被忽悠瘸了