Home Sign Up Sign In
DAOCLOUD
推荐学习书目
› Python Cookbook
› Using Google App Engine
推荐下载
› Latest Google App Engine SDK
其他兼容技术
› AppScale
jeeson

从 App Engine 的运行状态统计报告比较 Go, Java, Python 3 种语言的 计算性能：Go 与 Java 相当，Python 就...

  •   
  •   jeeson · May 16, 2013 · 6050 views
    This topic created in 4752 days ago, the information mentioned may be changed or developed.
    Go: 大约 80ms
    https://code.google.com/status/appengine/detail/serving-go/2013/05/16#ae-trust-detail-cpu-fibonacci-go-latency

    Java：大约 80ms
    https://code.google.com/status/appengine/detail/serving-java/2013/05/16#ae-trust-detail-cpu-fibonacci-java-latency

    Python：400ms
    https://code.google.com/status/appengine/detail/serving/2013/05/16#ae-trust-detail-cpu-fibonacci-latency


    Go/Java 计算的是 33rd Fibonacci number，Python 计算的是 25th Fibonacci number
  • Python
  • Java
  • Go
    4 replies  •  1970-01-01 08:00:00 +08:00
    oa414
        1
    oa414  
       May 17, 2013
    这种计算fib数列的测试都是耍流氓。。。不能反映real world下的性能
    ljbha007
        2
    ljbha007  
       May 17, 2013
    python用来写算法题 性能都很搞笑
    y
        3
    y  
       May 17, 2013
    代码在哪里? 用的是 O(log n) 的算法吗?
    davepkxxx
        4
    davepkxxx  
       May 17, 2013
    Python的优势不在于运行速度。
    About   ·   Help   ·   Advertise   ·   Blog   ·   API   ·   FAQ   ·   Solana   ·   5764 Online   Highest 6679   ·     Select Language
    创意工作者们的社区
    World is powered by solitude
    VERSION: 3.9.8.5 · 60ms · UTC 02:08 · PVG 10:08 · LAX 19:08 · JFK 22:08
    ♥ Do have faith in what you're doing.