V2EX = way to explore
V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方
现在注册
已注册用户请  登录
xujiajun
V2EX  ›  PHP

2017 非标准 PHP 框架性能测试比较

  •  
  •   xujiajun · 2017-10-27 11:48:24 +08:00 · 8152 次点击
    这是一个创建于 2571 天前的主题,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。

    原文: https://xujiajun.cn/2017/10/27/php-framework-benchmark/

    我最近在给tastphp 完善说明文档 有一节是性能测试比较 ,才有了下面这个项目,有什么说的不对的地方,大家给我指正。一起交流才有进步!

    项目托管地址: https://github.com/xujiajun/php-framework-benchmark

    针对 github 上比较活跃的几个开源项目,做了简单的比较。供大家参考:

    php framework benchmark (include laravelsymfonysilexlumenslimyii2tastphp)

    所有框架仅输出 "ok",就仅测试框架的本身的性能。如果有精力可以测下带有数据库交互的测试。

    以下测试仅供参考,如果你想测的准,建议在生产环境测试!

    测试的环境

    OS Name:        Mac OS X
    OS Version:     10.12.6
    Architecture:   x86_64
    CPU:Intel Core i7  1.7 GHz *2
    RAM:8 GB
    PHP version 7.1.10
    

    各个框架的版本

    Laravel version 5.5.0
    Lumen version 5.5.0
    symfony version 3.3.10
    Silex version 2.0.2
    Silm version 3.1.4
    yii2 version 2.0.12
    Tastphp version 1.3.6
    

    测试结果

    Detail

    Laravel ab test

    Laravel version 5.5.0

    optimization

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    php artisan config:cache
    // php artisan route:cache  //cannot use route caching if you have ANY route closures
    

    ab test result:

    ➜  laravel-5.5.0 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://laravel-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking laravel-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        laravel-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   3.295 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      982346 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    303.46 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       329.538 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       3.295 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          291.11 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    1   1.8      0       8
    Processing:    22  311  59.4    315     571
    Waiting:       22  311  59.4    315     571
    Total:         30  312  58.0    315     571
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%    315
      66%    335
      75%    351
      80%    354
      90%    362
      95%    367
      98%    378
      99%    407
     100%    571 (longest request)
    
    

    Lumen version 5.5.0

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    

    ab test result:

    ➜  lumen-5.5.0 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://lumen-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking lumen-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        lumen-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   0.639 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      199000 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    1565.02 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       63.897 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       0.639 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          304.14 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    0   0.9      0       6
    Processing:     9   61   9.9     62      74
    Waiting:        9   61   9.9     62      74
    Total:         14   61   9.1     62      74
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%     62
      66%     64
      75%     65
      80%     66
      90%     68
      95%     71
      98%     72
      99%     73
     100%     74 (longest request)
    

    Symfony version 3.3.10

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    

    ab test result:

    ➜  symfony-3.3.10 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://symfony-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking symfony-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        symfony-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   1.716 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      237000 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    582.60 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       171.646 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       1.716 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          134.84 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    1   0.9      0       5
    Processing:    12  163  34.6    168     218
    Waiting:       12  163  34.6    168     218
    Total:         17  163  33.9    169     218
    WARNING: The median and mean for the initial connection time are not within a normal deviation
            These results are probably not that reliable.
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%    169
      66%    176
      75%    184
      80%    187
      90%    199
      95%    207
      98%    211
      99%    213
     100%    218 (longest request)
    

    Silex version 2.0.2

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    

    ab test result:

    ➜  silex-2.0.2 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://silex-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking silex-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        silex-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   0.747 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      237000 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    1338.53 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       74.709 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       0.747 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          309.80 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    0   0.9      0       4
    Processing:    15   71   9.3     73      88
    Waiting:       15   71   9.3     73      88
    Total:         20   72   8.6     73      89
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%     73
      66%     74
      75%     75
      80%     76
      90%     79
      95%     81
      98%     82
      99%     84
     100%     89 (longest request)
    

    slim version 3.1.4

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    

    ab test:

    ➜  silm-3.1.4 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://slim-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking slim-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        slim-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   0.703 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      333000 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    1423.44 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       70.252 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       0.703 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          462.90 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    0   1.0      0       5
    Processing:     7   67  15.7     65     210
    Waiting:        7   66  15.7     65     210
    Total:         12   67  15.1     66     210
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%     66
      66%     69
      75%     70
      80%     72
      90%     88
      95%     96
      98%    102
      99%    105
     100%    210 (longest request)
    

    yii2 version 2.0.12

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    
    

    ab test result:

    ➜  yii2-2.0.12 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://yii2-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking yii2-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        yii2-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   0.649 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      165000 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    1539.74 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       64.946 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       0.649 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          248.10 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    0   1.0      0       5
    Processing:    16   62   9.2     61      96
    Waiting:       16   62   9.2     61      96
    Total:         21   62   9.2     61      98
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%     61
      66%     64
      75%     67
      80%     69
      90%     73
      95%     77
      98%     89
      99%     94
     100%     98 (longest request)
    

    Tastphp version 1.3.6

    run commands before test:

    composer install --optimize-autoloader
    php bin/console cache:config
    php bin/console cache:route
    
    ➜  tastphp-1.3.6 git:(master) mv config/example.app.yml config/app.yml
    ➜  tastphp-1.3.6 git:(master) cat config/app.yml
    version: v1.3.6
    debug: false
    secret: tastphp
    # dev | test | prod
    env: prod
    timezone: UTC
    name: tastphp
    
    

    ab test result:

    ➜  tastphp-1.3.6 git:(master) ✗ ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://tastphp-benchmark.dev/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1757674 $>
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
    
    Benchmarking tastphp-benchmark.dev (be patient)
    Completed 100 requests
    Completed 200 requests
    Completed 300 requests
    Completed 400 requests
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 600 requests
    Completed 700 requests
    Completed 800 requests
    Completed 900 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Finished 1000 requests
    
    
    Server Software:        nginx/1.12.0
    Server Hostname:        tastphp-benchmark.dev
    Server Port:            80
    
    Document Path:          /
    Document Length:        2 bytes
    
    Concurrency Level:      100
    Time taken for tests:   0.487 seconds
    Complete requests:      1000
    Failed requests:        0
    Total transferred:      165000 bytes
    HTML transferred:       2000 bytes
    Requests per second:    2051.92 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request:       48.735 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request:       0.487 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate:          330.63 [Kbytes/sec] received
    
    Connection Times (ms)
                  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
    Connect:        0    0   0.8      0       4
    Processing:     7   46   7.5     48      55
    Waiting:        7   46   7.5     48      55
    Total:         11   46   6.8     48      56
    
    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
      50%     48
      66%     49
      75%     50
      80%     51
      90%     52
      95%     53
      98%     54
      99%     55
     100%     56 (longest request)
    

    广告时间

    start 关注下:

    最近也在编写以实际项目来说明 tastphp 的简单优雅好用

    中文文档: https://github.com/tastphp/tastphp-docs/blob/master/zh/SUMMARY.md

    欢迎 PR、issure 给我 你的 star,确实给我不小鼓励!让我坚持下去。祝国内产生更多优秀的开源产品!

    33 条回复    2017-10-29 12:45:26 +08:00
    sagaxu
        1
    sagaxu  
       2017-10-27 12:44:32 +08:00
    https://github.com/xujiajun/php-framework-benchmark/blob/master/laravel-5.5.0/config/app.php

    /*
    * Laravel Framework Service Providers...
    */
    Illuminate\Auth\AuthServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Broadcasting\BroadcastServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Bus\BusServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Cache\CacheServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Foundation\Providers\ConsoleSupportServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Cookie\CookieServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Database\DatabaseServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Encryption\EncryptionServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Filesystem\FilesystemServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Foundation\Providers\FoundationServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Hashing\HashServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Mail\MailServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Notifications\NotificationServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Pagination\PaginationServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Pipeline\PipelineServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Queue\QueueServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Redis\RedisServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Auth\Passwords\PasswordResetServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Session\SessionServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Translation\TranslationServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\Validation\ValidationServiceProvider::class,
    Illuminate\View\ViewServiceProvider::class,
    /*
    * Package Service Providers...
    */
    /*
    * Application Service Providers...
    */
    App\Providers\AppServiceProvider::class,
    App\Providers\AuthServiceProvider::class,
    // App\Providers\BroadcastServiceProvider::class,
    App\Providers\EventServiceProvider::class,
    App\Providers\RouteServiceProvider::class,

    用不到的可以注释掉
    php01
        2
    php01  
       2017-10-27 12:48:50 +08:00
    如果只输出 ok 两个字,你可以用用 thinkphp3.2 版本。个人认为是秒杀上面一切框架。
    iyaozhen
        3
    iyaozhen  
       2017-10-27 12:58:36 +08:00
    可以再加个原生的
    k9982874
        4
    k9982874  
       2017-10-27 13:00:16 +08:00
    看到这个文章 就知道是来打 laravel 脸的
    towser
        5
    towser  
       2017-10-27 13:03:17 +08:00
    光输出 ok 测试的主要是路由性能,应该通过依赖容器生成一些对象来测试容器性能。
    sunmonster
        6
    sunmonster  
       2017-10-27 13:08:10 +08:00
    php 除了本身框架之外,php-fpm 调优也很重要,像 slimphp,纯输出的话,我笔记本基本能到 3000,但是 3000 其实很低的,nodejs 都是 3,4 万的,swoole 能达到 12 万,查一条数据,swoole 能达到 6000,所以 php 里面除了 swoole 能用一下,其它框架没有啥用的理由了。有人说等你业务达到这个量再来讨论性能,那么我用一台机器能解决问题,为啥要用 10 台呢? laravel 在我的机子上勉强能上 500 的
    Sor
        7
    Sor  
       2017-10-27 13:12:12 +08:00
    thinkphp 呢?
    killerv
        8
    killerv  
       2017-10-27 13:16:03 +08:00
    想知道楼主有没有开 OpCache
    49gd
        9
    49gd  
       2017-10-27 13:17:11 +08:00
    那原生基本最猛了吧。
    2ME
        10
    2ME  
       2017-10-27 13:26:52 +08:00   ❤️ 1
    hello world 的测试在 V 站算月经贴了吧 看的有点够了 所以说一句自己的理解

    感觉摩托艇和航母比速度没什么意义吧 各有各的用处 追求速度直接怼原生就好了

    新手勿喷(逃
    xujiajun
        11
    xujiajun  
    OP
       2017-10-27 13:54:42 +08:00
    @killerv 开了
    xujiajun
        12
    xujiajun  
    OP
       2017-10-27 13:55:04 +08:00
    @Sor 没测 你有兴趣给我提交 PR
    xujiajun
        13
    xujiajun  
    OP
       2017-10-27 13:55:53 +08:00
    @49gd 原生 无框架 当然是最快的。但是谁会用无框架开发呢?
    HowToMakeLove
        14
    HowToMakeLove  
       2017-10-27 13:58:06 +08:00
    PHP 前期还是要看开发速度的吧
    xujiajun
        15
    xujiajun  
    OP
       2017-10-27 14:13:11 +08:00
    @sunmonster 你好 在我看来 php 之所以流行就是因为她的简单。框架的意义是性能和开发效率的权衡。还有考虑团队的学习成本。swoole 虽然性能高,但是学习成本在那里(各种系统编程的知识) 。试问有多少 phper hold 得住一个 core dump。对于专注业务开发的同学 其实同样时间 可能学习 Go、java 等不是更值得。于其说学 swoole,其实就是学 c/c++ 和 zend api 扩展开发。。

    另外 tastphp 也有 swoole 分支: https://github.com/tastphp/tastphp-swoole 可以关注下。
    loveCoding
        16
    loveCoding  
       2017-10-27 14:21:06 +08:00
    输出字节大小 1k,5k,10k....100k , 这样测试吧
    sunmonster
        17
    sunmonster  
       2017-10-27 15:00:02 +08:00
    @xujiajun 不是在于简单,是在于*生态**,swoole 的话可以利用 php 原有的生态,这是 GO 还比不了的,C,C++更别提了,这方面 nodejs 也有优势,所以做 web 业务首选 php,nodejs,而 nodejs 不需要特别的优化就有不错的性能,当然这里排除了团队的因素。swoole 不是很难吧,只是用的话根本不需要了解 zendapi 扩展开发,swoole 加上 Eloquent ORM 还是很不错的


    @loveCoding 一看就知道从来没做过测试吧,对于 qps 的量应该也没什么概念吧,无脑吐槽只会暴露自己的无知而已
    HYSS
        18
    HYSS  
       2017-10-27 15:18:29 +08:00
    <?php
    echo "hello,world!";
    ?>

    秒杀一切
    linpf
        19
    linpf  
       2017-10-27 15:29:55 +08:00
    @sunmonster 开发效率也是成本。PHP 开发主流类型网站,效率比其他语言会更高,同样开发周期,可以少雇几个程序员。程序员一个月工资得多少钱,服务器一个月才几个钱。
    WuwuGin
        20
    WuwuGin  
       2017-10-27 15:45:09 +08:00 via Android
    @sunmonster swoole 确实厉害,但是一般 phper 不会在乎的,并且知识面也达不到。有需求就会有这些 PHP framework 的存在。这其实就是为什么 PHP 一种被黑的原因,入门门槛低。
    loveCoding
        21
    loveCoding  
       2017-10-27 16:25:59 +08:00
    @sunmonster #17 没有吐槽你的意思 , 前几天看到新浪微博开源的 motan 框架压测数据是这样子格式的.
    sunmonster
        22
    sunmonster  
       2017-10-27 16:46:26 +08:00
    @linpf
    @WuwuGin
    实际并不是每个人都会这样去算成本,尤其是不太懂技术的老板。再说编程的话,总得有点追求,如果就单纯以完成业务就行了,那么刚培训出来的也能写,没有核心竞争力
    chrisyes
        23
    chrisyes  
       2017-10-27 17:10:36 +08:00
    carlclone
        24
    carlclone  
       2017-10-27 17:50:58 +08:00
    现实是,你性能再怎么高也没人用,这种东西做着自己玩玩就好....没达到性能瓶颈的人会选扩展更丰富的,达到性能瓶颈的人看不到你的帖子.....
    naixiaoxin
        25
    naixiaoxin  
       2017-10-27 17:55:58 +08:00
    现在 PHP7 支持了 opcache opcache 缓存之后速度会快不少
    askfilm
        26
    askfilm  
       2017-10-27 18:07:47 +08:00
    我们现在只用 symfony , qps 不在乎框架,在于开发人员怎么用

    还有,测个 helloworld 快有个什么用,业务开发快,跑的快才可以哟 :)
    sagaxu
        27
    sagaxu  
       2017-10-27 18:15:30 +08:00
    @carlclone 我日 pv 几亿,早就达到性能瓶颈了,也看到了楼主的帖子。不过我司是 Java/C++/Go 和 Swoole,楼主那个我们暂时不会考虑。
    linpf
        28
    linpf  
       2017-10-27 20:20:02 +08:00
    @sunmonster 你是站在技术者的角度上看问题,但是老板是要考虑成本的。因为节省的成本,是老板的利润。而且有一点你说对了,尤其是中小企业老板特别喜欢招那种刚入行的菜鸟来做一些简单的业务,杀鸡焉用牛刀。
    KgM4gLtF0shViDH3
        29
    KgM4gLtF0shViDH3  
       2017-10-27 20:21:42 +08:00 via Android
    @linpf 我觉得 py 速度比 php 快
    linpf
        30
    linpf  
       2017-10-27 21:10:30 +08:00
    @bestkayle py 没有 php 那么多成熟可靠的开源产品,而且程序员太少,二三线城市很难招到人。
    KgM4gLtF0shViDH3
        31
    KgM4gLtF0shViDH3  
       2017-10-27 21:14:38 +08:00
    @linpf #30 兄弟你说的开源作品是哪方面。。不管是数据处理还是 web 框架的开源作品都数不胜数了吧。。
    owenliang
        32
    owenliang  
       2017-10-27 22:01:31 +08:00
    用 PHP 就别考虑性能问题,有性能问题早就换语言了。
    sexrobot
        33
    sexrobot  
       2017-10-29 12:45:26 +08:00
    月经贴,

    你可以在 windows 上测试,把 laravel 的 QPS 成功优化到 99 以下
    关于   ·   帮助文档   ·   博客   ·   API   ·   FAQ   ·   实用小工具   ·   2690 人在线   最高记录 6679   ·     Select Language
    创意工作者们的社区
    World is powered by solitude
    VERSION: 3.9.8.5 · 27ms · UTC 09:48 · PVG 17:48 · LAX 01:48 · JFK 04:48
    Developed with CodeLauncher
    ♥ Do have faith in what you're doing.